×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Complete Street Design Manual DRAFT (external)

File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-

Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%

Click anywhere in the document to add a comment. Select a bubble to view comments.

Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio

Comments

View all Cancel

Add comment


The entity or entities making these design approach determinations will be critical!
Same comment regarding depressed bike lanes next to parking
Suggestion
Would like to see some specific mention on providing youth safe access to schools and parks.
Consider bike lane at sidewalk level when adjacent to parking - otherwise it's an accessibility barrier and tripping hazard
Recommend language that requires a public access easement or ROW dedication where there is not enough ROW to meet the pedestrian standards (which will often be the case)
Just to be clear to the average reader, I would emphasize that "all modes of transportation" includes bikes, pedestrians, transit, etc.
Recommend a discussion about what "appropriate LFUCG authority" makes the final determination on design and include it in the manual. Ideally, it would be a technical committee that represents a cross section of transportation representatives including vehicular, bike, pedestrian, and transit. It could also include review by a citizen's advisory committee (and/or BPAC) to make a non-binding recommendation. There will have to be compromises in nearly every street ROW, so it should not default to traffic engineering alone. This is what impedes implementation in many complete streets plans.
Suggestion
Is 10' of horizontal separation from the dripline or the trunkline?
Suggestion
Undergrounding electric utilities involves significant cost. While underground facilities provide important benefits, KU is obligated by the Public Service Commission to meet customer demand using the most reasonable and least‑cost means available to maintain affordability. As a result, KU selectively undergrounds facilities where such investments are prudent and justified.
Suggestion
KU facilities are best located in frontage / amenity / planting strip zones for long-term reliability, resiliency, and maintenance of assets. Accessibility is critical for electric infrastructure. What is an "open space" behind buildings today may not be open in the future.
Suggestion
Electric utilities will need safe access to facilities.
Suggestion
Electric utilities will need access to public ROW to feed pedestrian/street lights. Note: any requested changes to KU's lighting options would require PSC approval.
Question
Are there maximum height limitations as well?
Question
For existing overhead electric assets located within the PAR, will utilities be granted permits for relocation of assets to amenity zone / vegetated buffer for retrofits?
Suggestion
Should include a blank line between these paragraphs.
Question
Should this include something about design for curb cuts or anything specific for Green Infrastructure?
Question
Should the 3 statements following this colon be bulleted?
Question
Report or Manual?
Question
Cited as LFUCG Geotechnical Manual in 8.2.1.3. Is it the same?
Suggestion
Period at the end.
Suggestion
Period at the end.
Suggestion
b. is not tab set at the same location as a.
Suggestion
Needs an additional blank line between these two paragraphs.
Suggestion
The headings Design Guidance and Design Requirements are formatted differently in this chapter than the previous 5 chapters.
Question
Why is this highlighted?
Suggestion
The information in these bullets should end in a period. Currently, only the last bullet follows that format.
Suggestion
Resources are bolded in other chapters.
Suggestion
This is the only bullet with a period.
Suggestion
This is the only bullet without a period.
Suggestion
In the other sections, these bullets have capital letters to start the info in the bullet.
Suggestion
This is the only bullet in this group without a period.
Suggestion
These sub-bullets shouldn't have periods at the end.
Suggestion
All the other bullets have a period at the end.
Suggestion
Inconsistent period use. Present on 1 and 5, but not the others.
Suggestion
Design Requirements shouldn't be a bullet. It should mimic the format of Location Standards.
Question
Why are these underlined?
Suggestion
The Location Standards all have periods at the end of the bulleted information, but the Design Requirements don't.
Suggestion
This is the only bullet with a period.
Suggestion
This is the only bullet with a period.
Suggestion
Period here but not ending the others.
Suggestion
Inconsistent period usage. 1 and 4 don't have periods, but 2 and 3 do.
Suggestion
This one has a period, but the other bullets don't.
Suggestion
No period here but present in the other bullets.
Suggestion
Inconsistent period usage. Present in 1 and 2, but not 3.
Suggestion
Since these are multiple sentence bullets, they should end in a period. #4 is the only one with a period at the end currently.
Suggestion
Inconsistent hyphenation of left-turn lane. Either add hyphens where noted or they need to be removed in a variety of places.
Suggestion
Should be hyphenated
Suggestion
Should be hyphenated
Suggestion
Should be hyphenated
Suggestion
Should be hyphenated